Comments for Handhelds, Linux and Heros

Comment on GPE PIM for N800 / Maemo 3.0 by | Creeva's World 2.0

| Creeva's World 2.0 — Fri, 09 May 2008 13:42:51 +0000

[...] show up I decided to take my N810 onto the guest wifi. While doing that I installed Vim and the GPE suite. I’m going to be working on getting GPE calender to sync with Google Calender. I [...]

Comment on GPE trademark rejected by A User

A User — Sat, 05 Apr 2008 11:37:15 +0000

FYI, the Opie and ipkg trademarks have now officially been published (as of 2008-04-02).

Comment on Maemo Sync packages by CTIA Wireless… não tem nada de CTIA hoje | Pinguins Móveis

CTIA Wireless… não tem nada de CTIA hoje | Pinguins Móveis — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 02:35:25 +0000

[...] pessoal do Maemo não pára: talvez você precise de um leitor de RSS novo, testar sua sorte sincronizando o Maemo+GPE, saber sobre aplicações Web que se dão bem com o browser dos ITs, ou então precisar de um [...]

Comment on Maemo Sync packages by Florian

Florian — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 23:42:58 +0000

Well, I would consider the 0.2x branch to become unmaintained soon. There is not much use in developing a new tool basing on the old API and waiting for 0.4 to arrive. I guess once the GUI starts to become stable OpenSync will do the same… if it is not even faster.

Comment on Maemo Sync packages by turn.self.off

turn.self.off — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:20:09 +0000

isnt the 0.3x opensync stuff labeled as unstable? as in, if one want reliable service one should use the 0.22 release?

Comment on Preparing LinuxTag 2008 by Philippe De Swert

Philippe De Swert — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 00:28:58 +0000

Let s hope I get more features in gpe-mini-browser2 by then. Would be nice to be able to show off our webkit based browser :) (OE build fails atm because of a missing linker flag in the webkit .pc file. Adding -lstdc++ to the Makefiles CFLAGS makes it build in OE too in case you wanted to try it out)

Comment on GPE trademark rejected by A User

A User — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 23:51:32 +0000

Some info:

http://www.houstoninternetlaw.com/trademark/trademark-opposition.html

The period is 30 days, so if it has indeed already been published, there is not much time left.

Comment on GPE trademark rejected by Florian

Florian — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 11:21:47 +0000

Update: The USPTO website mentiones both the IPKG and the OPIE trademark as published for opposition - so what can we do?

Comment on GPE trademark rejected by Florian

Florian — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 11:07:00 +0000

Thanks for all the feedback! Just a few remarks to some comments:
3+4: Yes, it seems that he had more luck with the Opie trademark unfortuately. It would be good to get to know when it is published and how people can help fighting it then.
5: hh.o in general is dead - a part of the wiki is static and even the most important projects there (including ipkg) are dead. Only the kernel port and Linux device support sections in the wiki are still active. I hope the mobile-linux project can replace this some day.
9: The whole text is really unreasonable and simply wrong. Apart from these examples e.g. the domain was owned by Kelly Martin till a few years ago and not registered by G.F. in 1999

Comment on GPE trademark rejected by A User

A User — Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:31:06 +0000

Check this out:

http://tinyurl.com/2eygjb

“Mr France originated the marks in 2001 and 2002…” - he originated the GPE and Opie trademarks now?